top of page
Image 1-21-22 at 5_edited.png

Current Management Issues in Utah

The State of Utah’s mountain lion management policies and practices threaten a vital keystone species, a natural balance, public safety, lifestyles, traditions, and livelihoods.

WHAT’S HAPPENING

What's Happening

In recent years, the State of Utah has implemented aggressive predator management policies and practices intended to significantly reduce or, in some units, eliminate as many of the State’s mountain lions as possible.  The State is trying to protect its mule deer population, as hunting is a significant contributor to the State’s annual recreational income that reached $9.5B in 2023.  Primary supporters of these elimination efforts include mule deer and wild sheep conservation groups. 

  1. 2020: HB 125 tasks the Division of Wildlife Resources to take immediate action under certain circumstances when a big game population is under the established herd size objective for a management unit (which is currently set at over 404K). This opened a significant portion of the State's mountain lions to unlimited, year-round hunting. Permits were still required in Predator Management units and hunters were still limited to two lions each.

  2. 2023: HB 469 expands the unlimited, year-round hunting season to 12 months, reduces licensing needs to only a general hunting license, and introduces trapping and snaring. Restrictions on how many lions could be taken by hunters and trappers were lifted. Now individual hunters and trappers could kill mountain lions without any limits whatsoever.

  3. December 2025, DWR teams with BYU to study the effects on the mule deer populations by eliminating cougars from 6 units; Wasatch East, Stansbury, Monroe, Boulder, Zion, Pine Valley (4 being in southern UT). 

  4. Word has surfaced that as of January 2026 the Wild Sheep Foundation is offering a $1500 bounty for mountain lions taken on specific sheep management units.

***Map illustrating the 6 management units of the BYU “study."

Map illustrating the 6 management units of the BYU elimination “study”
The Issue

THE ISSUE

Concerns have been raised across wildlife advocacy and conservation groups, scientific communities, hunters, ranchers and the general public.  Some of those concerns include: 

 

  1. Lack of public input: Formal public input has not been requested on HB125, HB469, the BYU study, and the WSF bounty. The aggressive cougar harvesting provisions of HB 469 had no debate and very little discussion on the floor. Governor Cox signed the bill with hesitation.

  2. Lacking science: Evidence abounds within the scientific community that elimination of a native species in hopes of saving another doesn’t work. In fact, the collateral damage of man tinkering with the natural balance of things, especially apex predators, has played out time and again. The State’s methods appear driven by political (i.e. monetary) influences rather than scientific calculus. 

  3. Public and pet safety: Information regarding the location, quantity and type of traps and snares used for cougar eradication is not available to the public. This poses a risk to our family and friends, the general public, the tourists the State encourages to explore our precious outdoors, and our pets.

  4. The effect on private lands: Trapping and snaring are allowed on private land as well.  Trappers must receive written permission from the private landowners before placing any traps or snares.  But this potential presence on your neighbor’s property amplifies the safety concerns of traps ensnaring unwary people and pets.

  5. The rise of chronic wasting disease (CWD): Cases of CWD in Utah are rising within our mule deer population.  CWD was first recorded in the Vernal area in 2003. As of February 2026, 435 mule deer had tested positive for CWD. The State speaks of preventative measures to help control it. Yet, removing a primary apex predator that helps control the spread of such diseases is another contradiction against the State’s methods.

  6. The mule deer population target is outdated: The main reason for the culling of cougars is for the State to try to achieve its mule deer population target of 404,900. Yet those numbers haven’t been realized in Utah in decades. In the 70s and 80s when Utah was much more rural the mule deer population was 500,000 plus. Yet the 2010 estimate was only 261,300, peaking in 2015 at 385,450 then dropping to 324,170 in 2025. Urban sprawl has had a meaningful impact on the historical mule deer range. So is the State’s target reasonable given everything affecting the mule deer populations?

  7. An unknown entity: Population estimates of Utah’s mountain lions has ranged from just over 1000 to 2700.  That’s a big range, which means no one knows. What’s the critical mass required to avoid extinction and how do we know we’ve reached it?  Are these predator management practices destined to repeat the same mistakes Man has made with the wolves and grizzlies where we eradicate, rethink, then reintroduce? 

  8. The economic motivators are short-sighted: The total annual ripple effect of hunting in Utah is over $1B in annual revenues, and mule deer hunting is the primary driver of the State’s hunting economy.  Trying to improve or even maintain this revenue stream by tweaking nature's “formula” risks long term sustainability for short term gains. This practice of tactical implosion plays out frequently in corporate settings where the drive for short term profits overtakes the discipline of long term strategic planning.  

  9. The threat to lifestyles and livelihoods: Houndsmen have had little input into the State’s methods and are concerned about the eradication of a species that has contributed to generations of lifestyles and livelihoods. By impacting the houndsmen the State is impacting the very economies they’re trying to protect.

  10. Upsetting the ecological balance: Removal of one apex predator increases opportunities for others normally kept in check by the one removed.  Read Andy Rice’s article in the Salt Lake Tribune where he, as a farmer/rancher, methodically outlines the negative series of events that removing the cougar could have on the broader ecosystem.  

  11. Traps and snares are not species-specific: In addition to the threat to personal pets, collateral damage will occur to other predator species.  How will the impact of this collateral damage be measured and assessed? 

  12. Subsequent financial impact to farmers and ranchers: The more deer, the more the over-grazing of the shrinking natural landscape, which compels the deer to feed on crops and vegetation intended for livestock and man.

  13. Increase in negative human contacts: Young cougars stay with their mothers for approximately 18 to 24 months. Killing a mother before the cubs are of hunting age is life-threatening to the cubs. Killing the mother before the cubs gain independence risks producing a cougar without honed skills to hunt their natural prey.  As such, an inexperienced cougar is far more likely to assume additional risk in securing a meal of livestock and pets, ultimately increasing the likelihood of conflicts with the cats.

  14. Impact to neighboring cougar populations: Eradicating a species in one area creates an opportunity for neighboring cougars to expand their territories into the target units, thus culling cougars far beyond the originally intended geographic boundaries of the prescribed units. 

  15. This isn’t a public safety issue:  The State’s actions are not on behalf of our public safety, which suggests the State realizes cougars are not a public threat.  With less than 10 cougar attacks per year across the US and Canada combined. We are over 50 times more likely to be struck by lightning.  Yet, despite these realities, the State’s methods actually create a public safety risk that didn’t previously exist. 

  16. Conflict with our pro-tourism message: Utah actively promotes our outdoor assets to a global market to drive an $12B tourism industry (2022 income).  Yet while the State promotes the value of our great outdoors, it’s dismantling cornerstones to a healthy ecosystem while increasing safety risks to the very tourists they’re soliciting.


The goals are simple:

  1. Stop “The Study”

  2. Stop the WSF bounty

  3. Reverse HB 469 and HB 125
     

Establish more balanced scientific predator management practices while promoting coexistence within our communities.

Goals
Male mountain lion

How you can help


Here are a few simple actions you can take to help protect our mountain lions.

 

1. Reach out to these groups that represent your interests and talk to them about what's going on and how they can get involved to help influence change for Utah's mountain lions.

 

2. Contact your local Utah Legislators to express your concern about the State’s policies and practices. Be respectful.

 

3. Contact the DWR Board Members expressing concern over their actions.

 

4. Join the momentum by contacting Utah Mountain Lion Conservation today.

 

5. Sign the petition through the Change.org campaign.

 

6. Attend your local DWR RAC and Wildlife Board meetings to help build awareness of the issues.

 

7. Learn more about how to coexist with mountain lions.

Help
Policy

Policy / study supporters:

 

 

NOTE: both the Wild Sheep Foundation and the Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife actively promote their roles as conservationists. 

Yet “conservation” is defined as:

1. prevention of wasteful use of a resource.
2. the principle by which the total value of a physical quantity remains constant in a system which is not subject to external influence.

Eliminating one native species to save another would seem to conflict with the conservationist’s credo.  

Resources

Additional Resources

  1. DWR’s Annual Cougar report 2024 

  2. DWR’s Big game, black bear and cougar annual reports archives

  3. DWR’s R657-24 - Compensation for mountain lion, bear, wolf or eagle damage

  4. DWR’s Regional Advisory Council (RAC) meeting schedule

  5. DWR’s Black Bear, cougar and furbearer guidebook

  6. DWR’s Utah Mule Deer Statewide Management Plan 2025-30 DWR’s interactive map on Utah’s hunting units

  7. DWR’s interactive map on Utah’s hunting units

  8. Town of Boulder’s Feb 3 2026 Council Meeting discussing the issue (line item 9.8)

SUPPORTING ARTICLES: Many articles have surfaced outlining and challenging the State’s methods.  Here are but a few:

 

  1. MLF: Utah’s Cougar Study: A Lethal Program Without Rigorous Science (Dec 22, 2025).

  2. Cougar Fund: Update on the Wildlife Board Meeting in Farmington Utah (Jan 8 2026)

  3. Salt Lake Tribune article featuring farmer Andy Rice of Boulder, UT: Cougars Have Cost Me Thousands of Dollars in Livestock. That Doesn't Mean I Want Them All Killed (Jan 20, 2026).

  4. Felidae Conservation Fund: The Flawed Logic of Utah’s Mountain Lion Culling Study (Feb 18, 2026)

  5. KUER: Utah is Culling Mountain Lions to Study the Impact on Deer (Jan 9, 2026)

  6. KSL: Utah DWR Gets Pushback on Study Culling Mountain Lions to Improve Mule Deer Population (Jan 9, 2026)

  7. Citizen Portal: Utah DWR Outlines Controlled Cougar-Reduction Study; Public Raises Safety and Process Concern (Dec 18, 2025)

  8. Western Wildlife Conservancy: Intensive Cougar Culling Experiment

Salt Lake Tribune reviewing the 2023 lawsuit against the State:: Utah’s Mountain Lions Could Vanish in Three Years Lawsuit Claims (Oct 20, 2023)

ABOUT US >

We are a dedicated and diverse group of Utah residents that are interested in mountain lions, their protection, management, and improving our understanding of them. Our work in Utah began in 2017 with the goal of improving social tolerance of mountain lions through the use of community engagement, education, and camera traps. As our work evolved over time, we became involved with other wildlife communities that were concerned about mountain lions, their management, our understanding of them, their portrayal in the media, coexistence challenges, and public perception. 

In order to do our best work for mountain lions, collaboration with all wildlife stakeholders is one of our core beliefs. By working with one another on shared goals, we can accomplish more for Utah's mountain lions!

Utah Mountain Lion Conservation is in affiliation with Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (SEE) a non-profit charity exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Thanks for submitting!

© 2026 - Utah Mountain Lion Conservation

bottom of page